http://www.jayrusovichlive.com/wp-content/themes/newpress

27 Jul 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

Marriage: One Couple, One Life…One Person?


harry_peccinotti_sexual_rev

Some people are wired for monogamy.

They’re comfortable with “content.” Pushing endorphins through the roof isn’t what keeps them out of mental hospitals. It never did. They don’t need the fire, the unpredictability, and the chaos of life out on the perimeter.

They just pass the baton to their kids and ignore the crows lining their power lines whenever they wander outside alone to stare at the stars and wonder what happened to the person they used to know. The one who still uses their name, social security number and physical mailing address.

This is where Xanax comes in handy, or the hooker housewife from AshleyMadison.com.

But these are the unmentionables. Even thinking about such things in the presence of crows is exactly why they’re sitting up there in the first place.

With this in mind, I actually do know people who accept married life for what it is. And most of them have never heard of ashleymadison.com, nor would they care. Their libido’s beat to a different drummer; someone who’s on vacation a lot.

It’s like they’re from some far away place back in history.

I see bookshelves filled with names like James Patterson, Tom Clancy and Sue Grafton. As an added bonus, one might also find a copy of Moby Dick and the poetry of Henry David Thoreau.

But you’d be hard-pressed to locate a DSM-IV, Nietzsche Anthology, or anything by Woody Allen, for obvious reasons.

I feel a little lost in their presence. Disconnected. Like I’m peering into another galaxy where the physics is different. Time seems like an endless flow of overlapping circles, rather than hard angles all pointing in different directions.

So I’m an outsider, a perceived threat; like a virus that’s looking for a way in. I’m dangerous because I mention the unmentionables. Think the unthinkable. Step outside the boundaries of what maintains this alliance.

Just imagine ragged concrete against the delicate surface of a water balloon, if that helps.

[unconscious dialog]

What exactly does he want here? I can’t predict his comments. He has to be contained because he hasn’t signed on to this world. He’s not one of us. And whatever loose pieces reside within us, he’ll exploit. Ours is a world of serenity, through which we see the rest of life; the one we want to see because we have to see if this is to continue.

I’ve always found it interesting how married people like this interact with me. I like to play, who’s the psychotic? Because they are so interconnected, so intertwined and so emotionally indistinguishable that I feel as though I’m embroiled in some weird, low level warfare with one – rather than two – creatures who carefully scrutinizes my behavior before deciding whether or not to change the locks.

23 Jul 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 2 Comments

“I Won’t Settle!” and other Bullshit.


jamieleecurtis

Won’t settle for what?

Something less than you deserve?

And what’s that?

How do you quantify your value?

The statement, “I won’t settle,” is either a scapegoat for some handicap, or just another way to get people to change the subject.

Handicaps usually boil down to some form of delusion, usually involving self-assessment.

This is where a woman imagines she’s more physically attractive than she actually is because of all the attention she receives from men trawling dating websites from a computer in the family den.

It’s called a family den because families spend a lot of time in them, including theirs, which you either don’t know about or don’t want to hear about.

So we have delusion fueled by lies foisted upon women by men who know women crave the fantasy as much as they do the affirmation they didn’t need 15 years ago because it was literally knocking the doors off the hinges.

So yes, the internet is a prime suspect in all of this.

But it doesn’t change the fact that attractive women are single because they want to be. And to keep it that way, they set up this perfect Prince fantasy to ensure it never happens and then blame God or something while they’re down in Jamaica at a “lifestyle” convention.

Is it not more desirable to fantasize about the Prince thing, knowing that you can still go home without being expected to sleep with someone who can’t hold a candle to your Jackrabbit – and still expects you to cook?

Is it not better to run profiles on 16 different websites pretending to be a hopeless romantic when all you really want is a little affirmation and an occasional lover no one has to know about?

In short, is it not better to play the same game and then bitch about the lack of quality out there?


21 Jul 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

Dr. Anton Zegoyavich Accused of Injecting Human Female with Stem Cells from a Burmese Python.


28-year-old-sperm-7767731

Zegoyavich at 63.

Zegoyavich: [speaking to me]

“Fools!”

“I have explained myself clearly enough. I am not interested in suspending my pursuits over some inconsequential legal or moral construct. Humanity rests in the balance of my work. Why everyone isn’t on their knees shocks me.”

Jay:

“Anton, from what I understand…”

Zegoyavich:

[cutting me off]

“You understand nothing, I can assure you! What they say is preposterous in its ignorance!”

Jay:

They claim you stole someone’s snake and then used its stem cells in a live human being against her will.”

Zegoyavich:

Be careful! I am not myself these days! My work is of a colossal nature, and completely alien to most. They are invisible to me! They attached metal devices to my wrists, kidnapped me, and then took me away to some horrific dwelling filled with animals!”

Jay:

“You mean they handcuffed you, placed you in the back of a police car, and then took you to jail?”

Zegoyavich:

“Even as they stand on the very edge of apocalypse I was chained like some base thing. I could spit! And your casual assessment of my misfortune is not lost on me, I assure you!”

Jay:

“Anton, you stole someone’s pet Python, killed and dissected it, extracted its stem cells, and then injected them into a woman you kidnapped from a nightclub in Las Vegas. That would constitute several felonies in a row…”

Zegoyavich:

“Stop that! I am becoming wild! I have no interest in trivialities! You and I speak from time to time because I perceive you to be somehow enlightened, perhaps a messenger from myself to the world. But today you sound foolish. They are affecting you. Beware!”

Jay:

“I am simply stating the facts…and bailing you out of jail for the 7th time, by the way.”

Zegoyavich:

“That tone doesn’t strike me correctly. Please identify your intensions!”

Jay:

“Anton…

Zegoyavich: [cutting me off, again]

“Stop with that ‘Anton!’ It is to be henceforth, Dr. Zegoyavich. I am not at all pleased at the moment!”

Jay:

“Dr. Zegoyavich, I have been your friend for a long time and have always believed in your work. I’m not here to judge or criticize you. I simply want to hear your version of what happened so that I can explain it to the authorities. They say you’re a deranged psychopath, and therefore, whatever you say is at best, unreliable.”

Zegoyavich:

“Who are these authorities in their amusing uniforms with metal trinkets in the shapes of make-believe stars? They are nothing but errant spores on an evolutionary thoroughfare. And not well adapted ones, I might add.”

Jay:

“Thank God the woman survived or you wouldn’t be leaving this place at all…probably never.”

Zegoyavich:

“Listen carefully to me. The woman was a necessary step in my process. She had no idea what a tremendous contribution she has made. I made her as comfortable as possible.”

Jay:

“You drugged her! And if given the choice, she would have had you arrested on the spot! She’s still in ICU on a morphine drip…not to mention the hallucinations.”

[as he continues to stare into space, apparently ignoring me, I persist…]

“Dr. Zegoyavich, the authorities don’t see things the way you do. And your work isn’t sanctioned by any medical body on the planet.”

Zegoyavich:

“Curious, this term, ‘authorities.’ What makes these people have such titles? Authorities over what? They are nothing to me. I laugh at these titles.”

Jay:

“You may laugh, but they’re deadly serious. Did you at least learn something from the experiment?”

Zegoyavich:

“In my travels and observations, I have noted certain similarities between human females and snakes of the constrictor family. There is a certain resonant psychology on a primal level that is easy to miss by the untrained eye…”

Jay:

“So I’m guessing you injected the python cells into the woman to see if her body would recognize the cells?”

Zegoyavich:

“Naturally. Have you seen the American movie, Frankenstein? The scientist in charge experienced a similar fate at the hands of people not unlike the authorities of today. They descended upon him with flames and knives and destroyed his home.”

Jay:

“Frankenstein is a work of fiction.”

Zegoyavich:

“I have seen it with my own eyes. How dare you tell me the beast didn’t exist!!!”

[end]

Note: People believe what they want to believe, even in the face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary, like alcoholics and narcissists. Having said this, the attending physicians at the hospital report that the woman is coiled up in a corner of the ICU with her eyes wide open, while Anton Zegoyavich is, once again, on the lamb; presumably in route to his laboratory somewhere in the New Mexico desert.

[to be continued…]

16 Jul 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 2 Comments

Yoga versus Therapy


yoga_times-square

In therapy you pay a trained Psychologist or M.D. to help alleviate psychological problems.

In yoga, you side-step the human condition altogether by tapping into the energy of the universe.

I dunno. It kind of sells itself…

Yoga is feminism’s answer to patriarchy.

If you disagree with me on this, you’re wrong. Not wrong because you have an opposing view, but wrong because your position on the issue is wrong. There’s a difference.

This is one reason so many drop-dead gorgeous women are packing yoga classes from coast to coast…and why certain male yoga instructors, including the revered yogi master – often from places like Cleveland – have improbable liaisons with women half their age and twice their I.Q.

There’s an angle for everything.

These guys offer an “enlightened” alternative to the baboons most women encounter in bars and nightclubs.

The popularity of yoga is really just a reaction to a food chain that appraises women at 35 the same way it did when they were 17.

Of course, at 17 they didn’t have a problem with it because there wasn’t much to criticize.

So it’s a kind of sanctuary for the disaffected.

In therapy you pay a trained Psychologist or M.D. to help alleviate psychological problems.

In yoga, you side-step the human condition altogether by joining forces with the universe; something that isn’t taught in medical school for some reason.

Yoga culture empowers women to express their sexuality under the pretext of spiritual awakening. They use the term, “awakening,” a lot because it sounds better than “fucking” in the context of higher human consciousness.

It’s also a way to buffer oneself from what is perceived to be constant, low-level patriarchal abuse.

Think packs of enlightened, confident, tuned in, empowered, intelligent and aware women with attitude and you get the sense that you’re in the middle of a war zone.

Yoga studios are places where women can express resentment without actually articulating it. These studios are often like psychological boot camps not unlike what one sees in groups like al-Qaida.

When a woman tells a man that she’s involved in “yoga,” the following message is conveyed:

“I’m enlightened, so don’t even think about fucking with me. I’m sexually open because that’s my right, but I only sleep with men who are on board with my message. I am smart, evolved, alert. I know all about shit you can’t even imagine. Fuck off if you dare walk in this class and stare at my ass just because I happen to be wearing paper-thin Lycra from Lululemon. I’m here to escape men like you. I’m here to escape judgment, superficiality, patriarchy. Of course, I do appreciate the attention, which I’ll deny under oath.”

The men who do join these classes accept the fact that they are perceived as emasculated members of an otherwise primitive gender afforded a second chance because of their efforts at maintaining cognition in the midst of what appears to be an all-out orgy.

With this in mind, I’m not sure which gender is the best adapted.

15 Jul 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

15 Questions from Women…


czech-girls-women-guides-image

“When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries of life disappear and life stands explained.”  Mark Twain

Question 1: Why don’t men like to be asked questions like, “Do you love me?” or, “How do you feel about me?”

Answer: Men display love through actions, not words. The fact that a man does something nice [unsolicited] for a woman speaks volumes. On the second question, men are repulsed by women with inferiority issues if only because it renders their  “conquests” meaningless.

Question 2: “How many people have you slept with?”

Answer: I don’t know.

Question 3: How do you feel about cheating?

Answer: The same way I feel about female passive-aggression, which I’ve discussed ad nauseam.

Question 4: Do you check out other women when you’re on a date?

Answer: Yes. But both genders are guilty of this practice. One’s just more discrete.

Question 5: Would you enjoy a threesome?

Answer: It’s not a preoccupation of mine, but sure, given the right circumstances, why not?

Question 6: Would you let a girlfriend drive your sports car?

Answer: On an empty road in broad daylight.

Question 7: Can a girl join a bunch of guys on their night out?

Answer: As long as she doesn’t inhibit their arrested adolescence.

Question 8: Do you usually know what a woman is thinking?

Answer: Sure. It’s usually several things at once, and most of them unresolved.

Question 9: If you think a girlfriend’s friend is hot, would you sleep with her?

Answer: No.

Question 10: What questions from a woman are off-limits?

Answer: “Do you love me?” “Am I good enough?” “Since I have no life, can you give me one?”

Question 11: Do men like comments like, “Can I bring you a beer?”

Answer: Yes, because it indicates she’s wired into the male psyche and willing to validate it.

Question 12: Would two BJs be too much for one evening?

Answer: For me, one would be enough. “Too much” is a bit strong, though.

Question 13: Why don’t men attach as easily as women?

Answer: I don’t know. But once they are [attached] it usually requires a police escort and a restraining order to get rid of them.

Question 14: Do you think women really want to know what a man’s thinking?

Answer: If they really considered it, NO.

Question 15: What’s he willing to do to get you into bed?

Answer: If he’s physically attracted to you, pretty much anything. Your vivid imagination simply isn’t enough to match his determination.

[end]

11 Jul 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

Worshipping Princess.


ldh_74

Self-love and inspiration is worth more than a thousand bent gold spoons! John F. Murray

Women often fantasize about being worshiped and adored by some imaginary Prince they read about in a fairy tale. But unlike Santa Claus and the Tooth fairy, alleviating this one requires prescription medication, like Haldol, for example.

Nonetheless, every once in a while a woman will report meeting a man who appears to fit this fantasy profile. He’s usually had an incestuous experience with his mother and now unconsciously relives the fantasy through a surrogate in the form of a pathological narcissist, who doesn’t fully grasp her actual role in his life because it’s not about his life.  It’s about what he brings to her life to make it even grander than she thinks everyone else imagines it to be.

Note: You have to keep this straight when dealing with these people, including the meds, because if you’re not careful they’ll grab  the Oxycotin, instead, to keep the fantasy strung out.

Put another way, she has to find someone damaged enough to justify the cost of being in her presence for more than 20 minutes without a cigarette break.

Most men I know have lives outside of the women they date, which is common in families where nurturing is shared rather than stolen.

Anyway, I was at a fundraiser the other night when this brunette decided to bless all of us with a surprise appearance after spending an evening in the Orion Nebula.

Her haircut was an asymmetrical black-on-black over dye, last seen on the Star Trek movie, The Wrath of Khan.

And I could swear there was a kind of luminescence hanging in the air around her head that looked like digital photographs of Holy Mary sightings over in Italy…and sometimes, Detroit.

She was accompanied by an invisible man who gave the impression of a quiet parasite on the bark of a cypress tree.

He stayed put.

He kept his eyes and ears to himself.

He didn’t wander.

He didn’t move or speak without intuiting permission.

His clothing was of subtle earth tones and unobtrusive.

This is what I mean by invisible, because by comparison, he was.

She was aware of other men, but refused to acknowledge them.

She would not interact with anyone she didn’t already know.

She came and went like the wind, as though it was natural for her to periodically mingle with life forms she herself created before disappearing back into some wormhole without a second thought.

But this creature is on a death march, because there is no wormhole other than the one she’s trapped in when she’s not on the Haldol.

The whole thing is a charade that’ll end up as a footnote in some psychiatric manual.

This is because two people are always and forever two separate and distinct people, not one thing without a padlock…no matter what star system you happen to be in.

08 Jul 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 9 Comments

What Is He Thinking???


womanman1

As you may know, I write a blog about the admixture of feminism and testosterone. I’m kind of like a scientist with advanced degrees in 19th century literature, so I’m obviously a qualified source for such things.

Anyway, The Tower of Babel [a cosmopolitan city typified by a confusion of languages] has nothing on the chaos feminism and male hormones have generated.

Let’s take a look at how this plays out: :

Unless your man is working for the Taliban, the first thing on his mind is food. In the case of the Taliban, it could be something as simple as a dry cleaner.

Anyway, once he gets past that – which can take a while – he might get around to you, depending on how effective you are at pandering to his need to objectify you.

If you don’t capitulate, he’ll disassociate during intercourse, which is where you notice him babbling on in a strange tongue about sexual scenarios that don’t include you…or do include you, but in situations you didn’t – or wouldn’t – agree to participate.

He’s going to get there his way, believe me.

The psychopaths are even less obvious because of something homicide detectives refer to as “missing time,” where a suspect’s physical whereabouts [or activities] can’t be verified for 3 or 4 hours every other day. And neither can anybody else, because they’re buried somewhere.

Aside from these individuals, men seem difficult to understand because women project their emotional complexities on to a base creature whose sole interest is self-gratification in the context of a 12-year-old.

I don’t mean this in any negative way, of course, but children do need their space.

When men have kids, for example, the majority of the problems stem from their resentment that they can’t do the same things: like throw food around restaurants, or roll on the floor with a plastic snake, for example. This while everyone else is passing plates of mashed potatoes and Thanksgiving turkey.

Men would love to sneak out the back door and chuck Coke bottles at passing freight trains if they could do it without being arrested and then ordered to serve 30 days at a psychiatric facility.

Personally, I resent kids for the latitude they’re afforded.

And I hate Thanksgiving Dinner, by the way. Who the hell wants to sit still [literally] for two hours or more [think penance] discussing stuffing with a group of domesticated adults, when they could be stealing Suburbans with a group of juvenile delinquents?

It’s all basically an exercise in domesticating children, which one never fully accomplishes, so why not just allow men to act out without having to hide it?

Answer: Because women want you to hide it so they don’t have to see it. They spend their lives in search of a lap dog who will allow them to stand in the spotlight as they grovel on command. This does occur if the woman in question is perceived to be attractive enough. But she’ll have to perfect the art of freezing time, because when enough of it passes, the lapdog will find a younger master.

Most women tell me that, if given the chance, a “real” man won’t do anything a woman wants to do unless they’re bribed or blackmailed. Fair enough, but women shouldn’t fantasize about a world where men grow out of childhood at some point, because they don’t.  And the ones who do are either struggling with some sort of psychological problem stemming from a dominant mother or have low libido.

Why women sit around and ramble on about this in the first place is amazing to me.

Why does adulthood hold so much appeal, anyway?

Why do women sit up when they could slouch?

Is it because men don’t like it when women slouch?

If this is true, and it is, then why do they do it? Why do they keep handing over everything to men and then expect them to change? Is it because they know that they won’t and that if they want to be with one, this is the price?

If I feed a Rottweiler a pound of free-range turkey every day, he wants the goddamned turkey, not the Purina. Don’t even think about giving him dog food because he won’t eat it.

Same with men.

The difference is that men can earn a living and then use the money to acquire a woman who will give up the turkey and shut up about the rest.

Not me, of course, but other men.

Women think men should think like them because they’re the same species. How ridiculous. Nothing could be farther from the truth no matter what the geneticists tell you.

No wonder women are so confused, frustrated, angry…and sometimes, homicidal.

Men want to keep things simple. If they go on a vacation with you, it isn’t about romance. It’s about how much fun they can have skiing or fishing or looking at other women in their underwear; which figures heavily in their choice of beach destinations. And sure, moon lit dinners at a beachside restaurant is great, but Mojitos sound even better, not to mention getting naked in public after three or four of them.

Still want to know what men want?

Do you still have to ask?

Okay, they want you to look and act like a streetwalker so they can play with you like a Tonka toy. And they like lots of you in different shapes and sizes because they get very bored fucking around with the same dump truck.

Want more?

He’s thinking about how he can avoid responsibility.

He’s thinking about how to best entertain himself, and in the process, triumph over his buddies in the other secret area of his life known as STATUS.

Yes, women figure into this “status” concept, but only when they’re in perfect physical condition, can complete a full sentence in the Queen’s English, and dress in a way that commands attention, in general, and adequately impresses his friends, in particular.

If this all sounds like high school all over again, it is.

Want even more?

Men don’t understand why women want to make things deep and complex when superficial is so much more fun?

So, you may ask, if men just want to have fun, then why are they so possessive?

The secret is that the possessiveness has nothing to do with you. It has to do with the primal connection between territorial control and status.

Didn’t I just mention this?

In other words, it has to do with other men. Just look at primate behavior and it’ll all fall into place.

Bonobos are a good species to study.

So what would men do if left to their own devices?

They would eat, masturbate, break things, and watch reruns of Evil Dead 3 and sleep.

Lesson: Feed him [well], play with him [roughly] and leave the premises without further comment room when he gets bored.

He’ll come find you when he’s ready.

That’s it.

07 Jul 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 5 Comments

My Cats and My Sanity [Questioned]


seb

“Sebastian”

I am being held hostage by two Persian Cats.

Other people surrender their lives to their children, but in my case, it’s cats.

They do as they please because they know I won’t place any boundaries on them. This is because I love them unconditionally; which is something most therapists will tell you is acceptable only in the context of human infants.

So I must remind myself, repeatedly, that I’m addressing an animal in order to avert homicidal rage.

Projecting human attributes onto a cat and then expecting it to respond in kind is like trying to get a hooker to love you. They love certain things about you, but the rest of it is bad for business.

But the fact that I cannot reason with them doesn’t mean I don’t try.

This morning I was pushed to the edge of one of the aforementioned episodes by my male cat, “Sebastian.”

Specifically, he assaulted a new $5000 Knoll Studio Barcelona chair.

The reason[s] for this behavior was obvious in the abstract:

He was being passive-aggressive. Somehow he wasn’t getting his emotional needs met; needs that I was unable to intuit.

So it was my fault.

Of course, I have no idea whether or not any of this is true, but how else does one communicate with a surrogate child who’s well past middle age?

So instead of sticking to my writing schedule, the two of us sat in my library discussing boundary issues and acting out as though I was having a discussion with a neighbor afflicted with extreme autism or attention deficit disorder.

The problem here is that I’m agnostic on the issue of whether or not cats get it. On some level, I think they comprehend my drift, but they use the “I’m a cat” thing to get out of any responsibility. I don’t blame them, really. I’d do the same thing if I could get away with it. I’ve tried, believe me, but unless I’m under sedation – like, in a hospital or something – it doesn’t work.

So they scratch a chair or pee on a rug and I suffer because I can’t kill them and they know it.

This is what I mean by being held hostage.

Sorry, I’ll get back to my usual writing topics in a minute. Even Howard Stern has to reserve time for therapy. Of course, he’s probably conversing with a human, which is more than I can say for myself.

06 Jul 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

Coffee Shop Attitude, Explained.


hippies12

“Look man, don’t think you’re better than me just because you’re the customer…” [and other crap from the terminally disenfranchised].

There are certain venues in every major city where service personnel act as though the customers actually work for them; places where customers must prove themselves worthy of being acknowledged.

I didn’t say served.

I said acknowledged, because that comes first.

The “serve” part sounds like slavery, so never expect it without an argument.

They just ask me to leave, but that’s me.

See, just because you walk in the door with dollar bills in your hand doesn’t mean you distinguish yourself in any way.

It should, but it doesn’t.

There’s a scene in High Fidelity where Jack Black, playing an employee at a vinyl record shop, dismisses an older “corporate guy” who comes in to buy music for his daughter. Jack doesn’t appreciate his appearance or choice in music so he verbally abuses him until he leaves with his middle finger in the air.  Of course, the move didn’t go over well with the store’s owner, John Cusack, who faced soaring electric bills, not to mention,  rent.

Nonetheless, the anti-establishment stereotype was well set.

I used to be one of those assholes, by the way.

But after I started making money, my inferiority complex fell by the wayside. Never mind the the therapy.

In view of this, here’s an abbreviated rundown of Houston establishments where many of the employees still struggle with this handicap:

Z, B, A, O C, E.

[first letters, only]

01 Jul 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

Burger King versus Radical Feminism [guess who's winning?]


web_587x799pixels

1] Radical feminism considers the male controlled capitalist hierarchy, which it describes as sexist, as the defining feature of women’s oppression [one reason women report problems achieving orgasm without a "Jackrabbit"].

2] Radical feminists believe that women can free themselves only when they have done away with what they consider an inherently oppressive and dominating patriarchal system [but they'll feign complete ignorance in exchange for money].

3] Radical feminists feel that there is a male-based authority and power structure and that it is responsible for oppression and inequality, and that as long as the system and its values are in place, society will not be able to be reformed in any significant way [just ask Chanel, Gucci, Prada and La Perla].

4] Some radical feminists see no alternatives other than the total uprooting and reconstruction of society in order to achieve their goals [the last time one of these women got a date was somewhere back in the 12th century - during some kind of plague - and that had more to do with bedside manner in exchange for a goat].

Echols, Alice (1989). Daring to be bad: radical feminism in America, 1967-1975 [Ms. Echols’ real name was George Tannenbaum. He was America’s first male-to-female transsexual, and the first case of transsexual discrimination  in the workplace after being fired from a Pittsburg steel mill for showing up in fishnets. The man who fired her was also fired after being spotted with her at a local bar.

Burger King has sponsorships with the National Football League and Nascar and tie-ins with “The Simpsons Movie.” It even came up with an Xbox game that sold more than 3.2 million copies last year.

“They hit a core demographic group — 18-to-24 males — and give them what they want,” said Bob Goldin, an executive vice president of Technomic, a food industry research and consulting firm.

Men are striking back with a vengeance – and I’m not talking about my generation – though there is some argument that we Baby-Boomers had something to do with it.

The way I see it, when you combine sexual and reproductive freedom with education and financial independence you end up with a civilization in its final hours.

I don’t mean this in any negative way, of course, but one can’t argue that it leads to fewer marriages, fewer children, and fewer arguments in favor of human perpetuity beyond one’s self.

Some consider this narcissistic, while others couch it as simple entitlement in the face of planetary extinction, without realizing their saying exactly the same thing.

Anyway, this trend has led to the creation of popular shows like “Life After People,” which boats a large following of those interested in what the neighborhood’s going to look like in 50 years…literally, 50 years.

This is something else they feel entitled to in spite of the fact that they’ll be the last human beings to see it.

In the end, I get really sick of these feminist arguments.

So what if the man comes home to an indentured servant who rubs his back, hands him a gin and tonic and generally worships him for paying the bills?

And so what if she also has to keep her mouth shut about everything else, like feelings, for example, which lighten the load for her, but make it a lot heavier for him?

And who cares if it takes a chain like Burger King to exploit the obvious in order to turn a profit? If it weren’t the truth, there would be no profit, which is bad news for women who will do whatever it takes to keep the house in Aspen, hence the ads.

  • RSS Subscribe to JRL

  • Categories


  • Blogroll