http://www.jayrusovichlive.com/wp-content/themes/newpress

29 Mar 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

Battle Plan for Urban Dating: The First 5 Lessons [there are actually 10, but you'll have to wait for the book]


screen-capture

To be an effective soldier, you have to train. And arguing with a neighbor over the condition of his lawn is not the same as preventing someone you don’t know from walking into First Baptist Church with plastic explosives.

The more complicated the assignment the more extensive the training.

The same is true of urban dating. Before you enter this arena you must be prepared for battle. Make no mistake about the metaphor. If you don’t agree with this assessment you’re an idiot and I can’t help you.

Onto the basics:

If you’re middle-age and no longer at Dartmouth, you’re no longer at Dartmouth and still middle-age.

I know this is a particularly difficult reality for men, but it’s a fact of life no matter how much you pay your therapist.

PLEASE DO NOT EMAIL ME ABOUT THIS. JUST ACCEPT IT.

From the perspective of urban dating this means that the insulated community you once enjoyed is gone. And many of the women who were once a part of it have married, born children and probably divorced…at least once. So what you remember about these people no longer applies, including their age, which for some reason never applies to you.

In other words, the fact that you’re now 50 has no bearing whatsoever on your perception that 30-year-old women are your peers.

Men always ignore their own chronological age, and instead, focus their attention on the age of the women they date. They never really see a distinction, even when we’re talking about 3 decades or more. Add to this the fact that many 30-year-old women are at approximately the same maturity level of 50 year-old men and delusion becomes reality.

Lesson #1: A 20-year age difference is considered appropriate to most urban, single men, and delusion is sometimes indistinguishable from reality because it is reality.

Lesson #2 coming up in the next blog…


26 Mar 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

The Urban Playground: One Surface, No Rules.


getattachmentaspx

“Everybody experiences far more than he understands. Yet it is experience, rather than understanding, that influences behavior.
Marshall McLuhan

……………..

Maureen is obsessed with a famous musician. She follows him all over the world. She is classified as a benign stalker by most federal agencies. She doesn’t approach. She doesn’t trespass. She doesn’t attempt contact. She stays on the perimeter of his life and fantasizes a connection that doesn’t exist.

In short, the two of them share a relatively functional relationship by today’s standards.

Maureen is also working on a book and fantasizes about one day having her own talk show. She does a little singing and live theatre as well, which she enjoys sharing with anyone willing to listen, particularly when she’s paying the tab.

See Maureen is a wealthy heiress, which makes her impervious to reality, particularly in the hands of a full-time legal defense team. She can say or do almost anything and get away with it employing the insanity defense, which is always effective at getting her out of jail in the middle of the night for sleepwalking on someone else’s lawn with infrared binoculars and a crowbar.

She is single, pretty [in a post-operative sort of way], entitled [which she tempers by doing a little charity work around Christmas and driving a Prius instead of an SUV], literate, stylish, sophisticated and confused. She simply doesn’t know what to do because she doesn’t have the vaguest idea who she is, as evidenced by her relatively functional relationship with a famous musician who’s happily married, lives 3000 miles away and couldn’t spot her in a police line-up.

So it would not be a stretch to conclude that she knows her fantasies better than she knows herself, which is kind of moot, if only because that is herself.

It’s no surprise, then, that she also hasn’t the vaguest idea how she is perceived by others as they stare at her the way children stare – wide-eyed and wary – at venomous snakes coiled up in terrariums; a euphemism, in her case, for sanitariums.

To most of us her actions blur the lines between the rational and the insane, you have to be rational to see this distinction, so I guess it’s moot in this context.

Maureen dates Michael. Together they represent a clear and present danger to anyone with a modicum of self-awareness, which pretty much includes everyone but the snake.

People like these find one another. And while they have no idea what’s going on in reality they share a connection to the world of fantasy they can both agree on, which is what I mean by functional in relative terms.

My point here is that self-awareness is critical to urban survival, insanity notwithstanding.

In short, you must either know yourself or know enough to find someone else who’s just as clueless.

From a psychiatric perspective, we all have some cross to bear. The question is which one? This is a bigger problem than you may think because there are lots to choose from.

If “boundaries” are the problem, understand that you will have no ability to navigate the complexities of a relationship without stepping all over the other person in the process.

This means you must be able to individuate from the other person.

For those of you who are still confused, this means that when two people are standing in a room, there is more than one person in the room.

I hope this helps.

So, if Jane morphs into John, John will end up having to carry Jane’s cross in addition to his own – which is fine –as long as he doesn’t mind. If he does, which would be a good indicator of mental health, and she subsequently starts with the binoculars thing, he can dial 911 and have her removed from his property, but not without a lawsuit over psychological abuse tied directly to his lack of boundaries.

23 Mar 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

What the Hell makes Sex HOT? Male Psychology on the Hot Seat.


bridgetmoynahanmenslifejan20084

“Leaving sex to the feminists is like letting your dog vacation at the taxidermist.”
–Camille Paglia

The following is a transcript between a, anonymous patient and psychiatrist, Catherine Vaginetti, on the subject of male sexuality. The physician encouraged the patient to free-associate, and this is the result:

Patient:

When a relationship involves emotional risk, there’s always a struggle to understand what’s at stake. I guess it’s really a struggle for validation. It’s like starting life all over again and having to individuate like an adolescent. In my case, like a marginal psychotic with some narcissistic delusion thrown in.

For men it’s a struggle for dominance, because it’s more empowering to look down at the other person than up at someone who seems to go on and on forever. Like a mountain you can’t climb without oxygen, which you don’t have enough of, so you can never get to the top.

Some women surrender by default, because there’s a disparity in asset allocation. I can’t believe I just said that, but reality is that hard. When the man is brighter, more successful, better educated…whatever…he holds the cards and she becomes a kind of indentured servant.

If you were to compare the way relative equals treat one another, I think the metaphor holds. But it’s a price she’s willing to pay and one that costs him very little because he’s not invested. But neither is she. So I guess it’s a wash.

Anyway, I think that most women know their strengths and weaknesses. And the ones who have more demand more. They know what they bring to the table and leverage it accordingly.

And all this plays out in the bedroom, believe me.

Hookers do the same thing, only they demand a down-payment for their physical beauty and willingness to morph into whatever empowers the client. This is where the bedroom thing comes in.

“Surreal” girlfriends also fall into this category. They just suspend the behavior over longer periods of time – like they’re in real relationships – in exchange for a specific lifestyle. They repeat mantras like “I love you” and “you’re special,” because in that context, you are…which of course keeps the whole charade going.  The man hears what he wants to hear and she’s paid for saying it. So they both win. It’s great for people who can slice and dice reality that way.

Dr. Vaginetti:

So what you’re essentially saying is that relationships are like shopping for automobiles.

I’ll take the red one with the leather interior, but no roof-rack.

And the women have to perform according to a set of specifications found in the glove compartment. If they don’t the relationship fails because he’s working with narrow behavioral margins that empowers him to be a man in the bedroom and presumably everywhere else. Is this correct?

Patient:

I think that men need to feel in control enough to assert their sexuality with confidence.

Dr. Vaginetti:

So what you’re referring to is the Madonna-Whore complex, where men split women into two distinct categories: one for procreation, and the other for pure, unadulterated lust.
The Madonna either spends the rest of her life playing a game that no one with any self-respect will play, or the man turns to the Whore; someone who may have self-respect, but is willing to sell it at fair market value.

Patient:

It’s not that black and white, but it’s not far off. The BDSM [bondage, discipline, sado-masochism] community sex calls it power exchange. Members role-play in order to empower one another in different ways. However you approach it the objective is the same.

People who are equals should rethink the whole relationship thing and pursue   friendship instead. Then they can talk about what fucking idiots their lovers are as they fantasize about what they’re going to do to them when they get home.

Dr. Vaginetti:

So you believe that intimacy and sex are mutually exclusive, or that the two can only merge when there is a disparity of assets, as you put it.

Patient:

Pretty much. A woman is sexually desirable to a man when she objectifies herself the way he objectifies her. She knows what empowers him and she plays the role. She may also be that person. Either way, she must keep the roles separate or place the foundation of her relationship in jeopardy.

If the man feels in any way threatened by the person he’s sleeping with, he will stop sleeping with her altogether.

There are a couple of exceptions:

One is men who feel empowered by dominant women. Perhaps they grew up in matriarchal households where the roles were switched.

The other involves men who aren’t particularly driven and enjoy the power of a woman capable of demolishing them.

Dr. Vaginetti:

So couples can sometimes be too close for comfort, and strong intellectual and emotional connections can destabilize a relationship primarily because the man in question feels too much emotional liability, and as a result, a decrease in perceived power?

Patient:

Yea. It’s why macho guys run for cover when confronted by a bright woman with sexual expectations. Now he has to perform for someone who won’t play the game.

Dr. Vaginetti:

So the woman must be perceived to be inferior, or she must pretend to be, which is unsustainable.

Patient:

Well the only exception I can think of would be a woman with a Ph.D. who spends some of her time in a mental institution…as a patient. This is where insanity can be a good thing; particularly in the bedroom.

Dr. Vaginetti:

Right, because now she’s perceived to be damaged in some way, which mitigates her Ph.D.

Patient:

I have always said that insanity is underrated in relationships and that people with fluid boundaries are key to a good relationship.

Dr. Vaginetti:

Which, by the way, is why you’re still on the couch and I’m still in the chair.

19 Mar 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

Loving the Alien


3771711-lg

“Women know all about reality. You just have to accept their version of it.”

…………………………..

Men are very good at side-stepping conflict in their relationships.

To counter this phenomenon women have developed a strategy guaranteed to short-circuit the behavior: It’s called passive-aggression.

Needless to say, it’s effects are not particularly pleasant for men who feel as though they’re being emotionally stalked. They can’t pinpoint the source, but there’s an ominous presence in the air even as their girlfriend talks about the weather.

Note: Women will employ a variety of convenient metaphors to introduce a discussion; none of which have anything whatsoever to do with what’s bothering them.

“It’s interesting outside; kind of cold and bleak — and comforting for some odd reason.”

On face value the words read as a kind of poetic abstraction, but for some reason they feel more like a cluster bomb. This is because it’s an indirect approach to something women know you don’t want to talk about. So to avoid triggering a seizure, they talk about the weather and hope that it softens you up for her next move.

“Is everything okay, honey?” he asks.

Of course, the response he wants to hear is something along the lines of “yes” or “no;” not another euphemism.

“I’m fine. It is odd, though, that the weather would be like this today.”

“What are you talking about?”

He’s gotten himself into something he can’t win; primarily because he has no idea what he did or didn’t do in the first place.

“Nothing, really. I have to get to work…”

“Is something bothering you?”

“I’m late, sweetie. You’re going to get me fired.”

So she kisses him on the cheek and walks out the door, leaving him with a vague sense of nausea. His job now is to intuit what’s wrong — or die. It’s that simple.

This is why some men prefer hookers couched as actual girlfriends.

Let me set this up for you:

Here’s the identical conversation, only this time, coming from a woman who’s on a monthly installment package:

“Ya know you were an asshole last night. How fucking dare you brag about my blowjobs in front of your friends! Try that maneuver one more time and the closest you’ll ever get to my mouth is a memory.”

Okay, now we’re talking.

This is what men want in a conversation – or in this case – argument. Something clear, concise and to the point. No ambiguity or side-stepping. No questions left lingering in some ominous cloud bank metaphor bullshit kind of thing.

Unfortunately, men often find themselves leaving cash on a dresser for a woman willing to pretend it works for her.

For some men this is a better arrangement. They don’t want the endless emotional drill-down that feels more like S.E.A.L. training at middle-age.

People say they want a connection, but when they get it they can’t remember ever saying anything about ever wanting it in the first place.

So men have concubines they imagine are girlfriends, but aren’t.

So what?

They extend their lives by another 10 years and fill up the empty spaces with piles of 18th century romantic literature.

It’s not half bad for 10 grand a month, and they never feel ashamed for acting like a sexual psychopath because the woman on retainer is one herself.

That’s why you pay the 10 grand.

18 Mar 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

The Intimacy Machine


clone2

“Intimacy is like ice road trucking…but you didn’t hear that from me…” jbr

I hate to use a forklift as a metaphor in this context, but the fact is if you don’t know how to operate one you probably shouldn’t be stacking drums of hydrochloric acid.

The same is true of intimacy.

“Intimacy” is a word that scares the crap out of men. It’s like taking away their spear in a face-off with a water buffalo; a situation I’m sure many of you have encountered.

Intimacy is what fills up all the empty spaces that you used to rely on to navigate your way through relationships with women. But now that they’re all filled up, you have to learn to navigate using a woman as a barometer.

This is why men are hooked on space junk; the stuff floating around between sex and emotional vulnerability. Emotional vulnerability is another buzz-phrase for intimacy. It’s interesting how many substitute words and phrases there are for this condition, but that’s because men don’t like to talk about it.

As I see it, intimacy is the struggle between what you currently have in the way of control and what you surrender to someone else to manage while you’re doing something else. Of course, you must realize that you’re handing it over to a highly sensitive and volatile creature that operates from a different set of survival blueprints.

Don’t make me bring up the hydrochloric acid again.

Even the Christian bible talks about it, but God himself should probably have written it himself because even his disciples danced around the subject using allegory and metaphor, presumably to avoid pissing off the women in their lives.

All we got was man is “head of the household” or something, and they left it at that.

Anyway, you better understand that when you get into a relationship with a woman she will test your boundaries, including your ability to share your feelings while she plays with them.

If you allow her too much rope, she will hang you with it [emasculate you]. There’s a delicate balance here between intimacy and certain death.

Men do not multi-task well. We focus on one thing at a time. This is part of our hard-wring and why we’re referred to as “hunters.” I didn’t say predators. There’s a difference. Women are more in line with the later, but I didn’t just say that.

Women are hard-wired for intimacy, which is really a weapon of sorts designed to keep men in line. It does provide some added benefits, though – like heroin – in that it can make sex really exciting. Feeling vulnerable is kind of fun for a guy because he’s not used to it. But too much exposure can kill him…so it’s a trade-off. In all probability, it also shortens his lifespan, but don’t get me started.

Women know all about this balancing act, but they expect you to be able to handle it without losing your manhood in the process. Women are about security and protection, which they expect you to provide, but they also want to make sure you can still be emotionally vulnerable without losing your hard-on.

Anyone who thinks this is a cake-walk needs to get off the morphine.

If you think of it in terms that a black widow spider will understand, the female has sex and then murders her lover.

It’s pretty straight forward.

Of course, in the human species, you have more options. You can get a divorce or you can learn to operate on both sides of the fence. One side is all for her and the other is for you, but she doesn’t need to know about that one, because if she did you’d go the way of the spider.

Just ask a 6-year-old to land an Airbus in a Kroger parking lot and this balance thing will start making sense.

Five facts about intimacy:

1] Intimacy must be on a man’s terms, even though it’s demanded by women.
2] Emotional vulnerability can squash a 300-pound linebacker like a cockroach.
3] There is no such thing as equality between men and women because they are two completely different species in spite of the striking genetic similarities.
4] Men must maintain at least a modicum of ambiguity when dishing their feelings to a woman.
5] Emotional blackmail is a man’s worst nightmare if only because it’s nonsensical under normal circumstances.

There’s a line in High Fidelity where Rob Gordon [John Cusack] says “You know the worst thing about being rejected?  The complete lack of control due to loss of control…”

Amen.

16 Mar 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

Emergence of the “Like-Girlfriend”


t_ballet_3000_blkstpat1

It had to happen, and now it has.

For you older [and I mean older] guys who want to believe that the gold-digger living in your house actually loves you, rather than the lifestyle you’re providing, there are now escort agencies rolling out a brand new line of women designed to accommodate the delusional.

The service is called “The Girlfriend Experience.”

Yep, for an extra $1000/week, you can get a girl to act like she knows and cares about you.

All you have to do is submit an autobiography [i.e. where you attended high school/college; a description of your family-of-origin; styles that appeal to you; sexual activities that turn you on; what you like to do in your free time, etc…], and she’ll do the rest.

“Oh honey, I love those black Chanel’s. They remind me of that wild reunion party we attended together back at Stamford. Of course, I was just your student back then…”

[No, she was actually in a federal penitentiary for aggravated assault, but that’s beside the point.]

This way you don’t have to second-guess the other hooker who’s sleeping in your bedroom, eating your food and coiled up like a boa constrictor next to your pool.

And you can even swap pathologies if you want.

You:

I’m a little freaked out by crowds.

Her:

Yea, I feel the same way. Let’s go home and fuck.

See how easy it is?

The truth is it’s as close as you guys will ever get to real intimacy with a gorgeous woman half your age and not have to worry about suffering a concussion when you try to end it.

See she never argues with you about anything…unless you want her to, in which case, you’ll probably have to pay an extra service fee.

15 Mar 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

Dying for Stardom


tyra-banks-bald

Bedlam breaks out at NYC ‘Top Model’ auditions
March 14, 2009, 7:35 PM EST

NEW YORK (AP) — Three people were arrested and six others hurt Saturday after bedlam broke out while they waited to audition for “America’s Next Top Model,” police said.

Police didn’t know what prompted the chaos involving hundreds of people outside the Park Central New York hotel in Manhattan. The panic left the street outside the hotel littered with shoes and clothing, according to news reports.

“It was pretty scary,” Jessica Paravati told WNYW-TV. She said she was caught up in a stampede after waiting on line overnight, hoping for a shot at stardom on the reality show.

……………………………

“Invisibility” has become a pandemic. We are “no one” unless we are rich and famous. This is because everyone who deserves to exist is rich and famous…which is why we are not.

You sit motionless on a congested freeway and glance over at a woman in a Ford Taurus with her head on the steering wheel. She’s thinking the same thing. And don’t forget about the guy in the pick-up truck in front of you sitting on the horn. He feels it too. All of you pathetic nobodies packed together like rolled luncheon meat on a concrete skillet living a life you hate in a world that forgot you.

In view of this, I think the media would better serve the public by videotaping Ms. Banks during her therapy sessions.

13 Mar 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

Hookers for Jesus, and other allegories.


hookers-for-jesus1

If it’s not already obvious, the underlying theme of jayrusovichlive.com is the struggle for relevance.

Writers seem particularly afflicted with this malady because they spend so much time thinking about who they are, which inevitably leads to some existential crap that I’m sure Nietzsche would have preferred to avoid if he could do it all over again.

Others who are distracted by wives, children, career, affairs, divorce settlements and blackmail should count their blessings.

Anyway, this is why many aging dictators are such assholes. They don’t want to feel invisible so they drop atomic bombs and/or threaten imminent annihilation to force people to think about them. That creature in North Korea is a good example. You can count on him to eventually act out if America spends too much time talking about the budget deficit rather than him.

“Am I dead or alive?” he wonders, because he’s never really sure until we acknowledge him.

Only then does he go back to cross-dressing.

Anyway, I’m working on an upcoming book, “Urban Dystrophy,” which is why I haven’t posted as often – though I do post every week; something I can’t say for most writers who just cut and paste photographs of porn stars and hope the distraction buys them some time.

In view of this, I’m sure most of you are wondering how the title of this article relates to what you’ve just read.

On first blush, it doesn’t.

But if you spend enough time thinking about it, one will appear…which is the point.

kim-jong-il-smiling2

08 Mar 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

The Psychology of Human Predation


legs

“Many recently-divorced older men think I’m hallucinating when I use military metaphors in the context of dating. What they see is a beautiful young woman sitting next to them who is two years older than their youngest daughter, claims to have a Masters Degree in Biochemistry from Colgate, and can’t stop talking about how much she loves Ritz Carlton properties  — if only she could afford them.”

*******

Back in the days before the Great Divide, a time when the population of affluent middle-age single men flooded the streets of urban America with unprecedented expectations of personal sacrifice [in the form of sex and commitment] from the very generation it spawned, I wrote a book that would answer some of the period’s most fundamental questions.

Not that it did much good.

Because the same demographic that ushered in the era of Woodstock, Flower Power, Volkswagon buses – and eventually – stock brokers, was also responsible for skyrocketing sales of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Erectile Dysfunctions formulas and pharmaceutical grade heroin, to name a few.

Anyway, one of the book’s pivotal arguments was that men simply stopped accepting the fact that they were aging, and instead, focused on youth, beauty and relevance as though they themselves were perpetually young, but with certain improvements. This mindset gave rise to virulent new strain of female opportunist obsessed with fine dining, first class travel and 5-star hotels, and the result was the creation of a new food chain.

As most of you know by now I’m referring to “soft targets” and the women who prey upon them.

Let’s review the basics.

“Soft targets” are older men who appear to be in a perpetual state of delusion when it comes to women. They assume that because their first wives loved them, and because they were successful in their careers, that they understand the most ruthless predator the world has ever known, including the Taliban.

This is why the most critical weapon in the endless war of urban survival is self-awareness…and why they need to lay off the heroin.

Self-awareness has nothing to do with the goddamned office, or how many times you got away with cheating on your doting wife. I’m talking about knowing yourself well enough to navigate behavior that has no discernable boundaries.

In other words, imagine yourself not coming home to your wife at all. Or just telling her you picked up a hooker and decided to spend the weekend at a Motel 6…and by the way, where’s dinner?

Am I getting through?

You must understand the game no matter how much you want to excuse your new girlfriend’s weird behavior for the sake of sex and the porous relevance it delivers.

You’re not necessarily going to die tomorrow just because you’re no longer twenty-five, so stop acting like it. The sad truth is that you probably won’t, which means you’ll have to figure out how to kill yourself before you end up under a bridge, which is an arguable scenario for a man who can’t distinguish perception from truth.

All you guys see is a beautiful young woman sitting next to you, who for some reason, is two years older than their youngest daughter and swears she has a Masters Degree in Biochemistry from Colgate.

That’s the first salvo, a maneuver otherwise known as the set-up.

She tells you something she knows you want to hear, but even more importantly, want to believe.

This is the real hook: what you want to believe. It’ll soften your fat ass up for the ultimate slaughter by allowing her access to your deepest recesses, which aren’t particularly deep as it turns out.

Some people refer to it as a suspension of disbelief; something one experiences when watching a movie. You go along with it. You get drawn in. And then it ends.   Conversely, when applying this mindset to a certain ilk of living human female, you go along with it. You get drawn in. And then you’re fucked. That’s the difference between a movie and reality; something lost on men who blur the lines.

Never mind that she has no traceable past whatsoever, or that she is in possession of two driver’s licenses with two different names – but the same picture, or has an aggravated battery conviction and post office box, only, in spite of the fact that she purportedly has an apartment somewhere.

Once the concrete hardens [belief becomes fact] it forms the foundation of a merciless assault.

There is no reasoning with these individuals. They crave the attention, the relevance…and the sex. The rest they deal with down the road. Many of these men are simply sex addicts with time on their hands to immerse their lives in the addiction. They’re so strung out on the endorphins they often come across as incoherent in the face of what is obvious to everyone around them.

Most of these women are just looking for a temporary respite from the storm. They know that men their own age won’t tolerate their insatiable appetite for self-gratification, so they take advantage of affluent older men who will. Women are also fortunate in that they have the ability to overlook physical flaws, or outward signs of aging, which makes them uniquely adapted to this form of strategery.

What men in these relationships don’t see is that while they’re intoxicated with the drug of youth, beauty and the fantasy of relevance, they are in the midst of implosion.

It happens in a similar way to sex addiction where the addict disappears for hours on end while his kids are at little league looking for their dad. Suddenly his family life suffers, as the splitting of lives hardens. One morning they get a phone call from the family attorney that hubby’s been arrested for soliciting prostitutes. In many cases it’s Merrill Lynch calling to say that they have to close his account because there’s nothing in it.

This is why most junkies die prematurely.

Unfortunately for those who don’t, they must go on long after the madness has taken permanent residence, and the woman who gave them their blessed gifts is now living with his stock broker.

Disclaimer: Not all young women are deceitful and opportunistic. Some actually enjoy the company of older men for obvious reasons. And many end up marrying and bearing children with them. It is also true that not all young men these days are jaded, self-absorbed, narcissistic, untrustworthy, disrespectful and overtly opportunistic when it comes to harvesting the spoils of generational feminism. But handsome and driven exceptions are hard to find, and for women who waited until their middle 30’s to marry, these men are virtually non-existent, hence, the older man.

04 Mar 2009, Posted by jay rusovich , 0 Comments

Not Playstation 3.


meteorite

Not that it matters, but the other day a meteorite the size of six school buses passed within 40,000 miles of the earth.

No biggie.

Just thought I’d mention it since it had the potential to flatten Manhattan in under a second.

Nevermind.

  • RSS Subscribe to JRL

  • Categories


  • Blogroll