31 Oct 2008, Posted by jay rusovich , 2 Comments
“Men are Pigs First, Human Second…” Psychatrist Catherine Vaginetti, Unloads
I recently had the opportunity to catch up with my friend and colleague, Dr. Catherine Vaginetti; a published author and renowned expert in the field of female behavior. The following conversation took place in my office, and concerned a growing complaint amongst women that men are, in so many words, “pigs first, human second.”
Jay:
Good morning, Catherine. Thanks for dropping by.
Dr. V:
It’s always a pleasure, Jay.
So, what could I possibly tell you that you haven’t already exposed about male superficiality and opportunism?
Jay:
My female readers wanted your take on it. They want a female perspective.
Dr. V:
Okay. Women enjoy male attention, but not at the expense of everything else that distinguishes them from primates. It’s annoying when the only satisfying conclusion to an evening with a man is a conscious or unconscious battle over whether or not the woman agrees to copulate. In this context, one could argue that men are pigs first, human second.
Jay:
Since women possess such humanity, they should start splitting the bills - not offer to split the bills -but actually cough up a credit card. From a man’s perspective, if a woman agrees to go on a date, there’s the presumption of sexual interest. If not, why are they on a date? If it’s business or friendship, that’s different.
When two men go on a first date, they understand the rules. Why else would they go on a date? It doesn’t preclude the possibility of a relationship. In fact, it determines its probability. So why is it any different for women; particularly in this blessed age of egalitarianism? It’s a double standard. And unlike lesbianism, it doesn’t work for both parties.
I hear men complaining all the time about women who go out with them just to get out of the house; thinking that maybe they’ll meet somebody else in the process. Of course, if she happens to be indigent – or completely psychotic – the man pays the bill by default, but not without questioning his own mental health in the process.
So who’s the hunter-gatherer now?
Men have grown soft and confused. Can you imagine a 21st century man having to actually hunt for a living?
The woman would have to slay the fucking meal before [whatever it happened to be] tore his head off.
Dr. V:
This objectification is pathetic. A man spends a lovely evening with a woman, and the only thing that determines whether or not it was fulfilling is whether or not he has an orgasm. Women have other things to think about, like children. They want to know a man’s true motives. Is he solely interested in sex, or is he interested in something more? Can he go the long haul or not? You’re always talking about Darwin, so from an evolutionary perspective, the nester wants to know whether or not the hunter will ever return.
Jay:
The hunter’s not returning without the orgasm, believe me. He’s not putting his ass on the line out of the kindness of his heart. And I didn’t say she had to sleep with him on the first date. What I am saying is that sexuality is a part of the experience; if she’s being honest. The guy would be overjoyed with something along the lines of “Hey, that was fun. How about letting me cook for you on Friday night?”
Men want to know whether or not it’s worth investing their time in someone who isn’t going to be a satisfying sexual partner…or a partner at all. If the sex isn’t good, the relationship is doomed no matter what the extenuating circumstances happen to be. The emotional resonance is an enormous part of it, but not all of it by a long shot. My female readers agree with me on this, by the way. The approaches are different, that’s all.
Dr. V:
Perhaps, but women still bear the brunt of the emotional beating, no matter what the outcome. Let’s not kid ourselves, here. Women are working with limited time frames. Men can go on and on like they’re immortal. Once their looks fade, money and power become the new veneer.
Jay:
Yea, well I’ve never heard women complain about it.
Dr. V:
The biggest problem with women is that they confuse fantasy with reality. Men are better at separating the two. Women buy into the images, the resumes, the line items…all without facing the actual person. But they don’t want to see that person, because if they did, the fantasy would disappear.
Every decision a woman makes is tied to the prospect of security. But you can’t win if you’re always playing not to lose. I tell all of my female patients to look beyond the veneer. But most opt for the fantasy and then end up on the couch.
Jay:
Men respond to beauty first, and sort everything else out later. Women go for the line-items first, and then complain about the lack of orgasms later. It’s completely backwards.
I like the male approach because you get everything out of the way before you’re emotionally [and some would argue, pathologically] invested. Then they decide whether or not to pursue things further. It isn’t the stuff of romance novels, but nothing ever is, which is why we have romance novels in the first place.
Men get to transcend their base elements and enter the realm of humanity for the discounted price of $19.95, with a Borders card.
Dr V:
You know, Jay, 20 years ago I would have put this chair over your head. Today, I want to put it over mine.
[end]
































